Summary

Cassell v. Texas — Opinion of the Court

The prohibition of the Constitution against discrimination because of color does not require in and of itself the presence of a Negro on a jury. But neither is it satisfied by Negro representation arbitrarily limited to one. It is not a question of presence on a grand jury nor absence from it. The basis of selection cannot consciously take color into account. Such is the command of the Constitution. Once that restriction upon the State's freedom in devising and administering its jury system is observed, the States are masters in their own household.
Source: Wikisource

Cassell v. Texas — Opinion of the Court

We have recently written why proportional representation of races on a jury is not a constitutional requisite. [18] Succinctly stated, our reason was that the Constitution requires only a fair jury selected without regard to race. Obviously the number of races and nationalities appearing in the ancestry of our citizens would make it impossible to meet a requirement of proportional representation. Similarly, since there can be no exclusion of Negroes as a race and no discrimination because of color, [19] proportional limitation is not permissible.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature