Summary

Charles Evans Hughes Kansas City Fort Scott Memphis Railway Company v…

We take it to be simply a tax on the privilege of being a corporation,-on the primary corporate franchise granted by the state. The authority of the state to tax this privilege, or franchise, has always been recognized, and it is well settled that a tax of this sort is not necessarily rendered invalid because it is measured by capital stock which in part may represent property not subject to the state's taxing power.
Source: Wikisource

Charles Evans Hughes Kansas City Fort Scott Memphis Railway Company v…

And, further, in determining whether a tax has such a direct relation to interstate commerce as to be an exercise of power prohibited by the commerce clause, our decision must regard the substance of the exaction, its operation and effect as enforced,-and cannot depend upon the manner in which the taxing scheme has been characterized.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature