Summary

David Irving v Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt… (2000)

He contends that the Defendants’ book is part of a concerted attempt to ruin his reputation as an historian and he seeks damages accordingly. The Defendants, whilst they do not accept the interpretation which Irving places on the passages complained of, assert that it is true that Irving is discredited as an historian by reason of his denial of the Holocaust and by reason of his persistent distortion of the historical record so as to depict Hitler in a favourable light. The Defendants maintain that the claim for damages for libel must in consequence fail.
Source: Wikisource

David Irving v Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt… (2000)

The Last Battle.
1.5 As these titles suggest, Irving has specialised in the history of the Third Reich. He describes himself as an expert in the principal Nazi leaders (although in his opening he was at pains to make clear that he does not regard himself as an historian of the Holocaust) . Many of his works have been published by houses of the highest standing and have attracted favourable reviews. It is beyond dispute that over the years (Irving is now aged 62) , he has devoted an enormous amount of time to researching and chronicling the history of the Third Reich.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature