Summary

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Jencks v. Quidnick Company — Opinion of the Court

They waited until the bankrupt law was repealed, until the result of the arrangements between the Spragues and their creditors, voluntarily entered into, was fully developed; and then, at the end of nine years, attempt to place a legal levy on a part of the transferred property, and say that the arrangements were illegal and wrong, and now invoke the aid of a court of equity to give them, for a trifling amount, a valuable portion of the property. If they were not satisfied with the legality and equity of the proceedings, they should have antagonized them sooner. Equity loves equality
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Jencks v. Quidnick Company — Opinion of the Court

In conclusion, it may be said that, generally, where a debtor, having large and scattered properties, and being much embarrassed, transfers his property for the benefit to his creditors equally, equity requires that any creditor who is not satisfied with the provisions of such transfer shall act promptly in challenge thereof, or else be adjudged to have waived any right of challenge.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature