Summary

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Lonergan v. Buford — Opinion of the Court

Suppose a written contract is made for the sale of a herd of cattle at $30 a head, excepting therefrom all yearling steers. Would not parol testimony of the number of yearling steers in the herd be necessary in order to show the number of cattle sold, and the aggregate sum to be paid? Evidence that the herd contained 1,000 head would not end the question, and parol testimony of the number of yearling steers would not be evidence contradicting the contract.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Lonergan v. Buford — Opinion of the Court

From information possessed by us, we are induced to believe that the entire number of cattle and horses by the contract aforesaid contemplated to be delivered to us on the 1st day of December, A. D. 1886, cannot be, and is not, by you so delivered,-i. e. that four hundred and twenty-two yearlings, forty cows, heifers, and steers, and two buggy horses, all of the value of $14,110, are not delivered.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Lonergan v. Buford — Opinion of the Court

There was no error in admitting in evidence the contract of sale to Hawkes of the 2,000 steers,-that being, according to the testimony, unquestionably the sale referred to in the exception and reservation named in the contract in suit,-nor the statements made by Lonergan, the defendant, in reference to the ages of the steers which defendants had sold prior to such last contract, and which they were to except therefrom.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature