Summary

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Winebrenner v. Forney — Opinion of the Court

The contention of the plaintiff is that the strip is to be taken as extending around the outer boundaries of the entire tract specified in the cession and relinquishment of the Cherokee Indians, while the contention of the defendant is that it is to be considered as simply around the outer boundaries of the tract opened to settlement. If the contention of the plaintiff is correct, the strip on the north, west, and south would be immediately contiguous to the land opened to settlement, while on the east it would be a distance of many miles therefrom.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Winebrenner v. Forney — Opinion of the Court

Ct. Rep. 55, and treaties cited. It was originally set apart for the use of the Cherokees as a sort of appurtenance to the 7,000,000 acres specifically granted as their reservation. Subsequently, by various treaties, portions of it were withdrawn from the Cherokees' possession and set apart as reservations for the various tribes named.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature