Summary

Portrait of David L. Bazelon David L. Bazelon International Harvester Co. v. Ruckelshaus…

There are some areas of administrative law -- involving issues of liberty and individual rights -- where judges are on firm ground in undertaking a substantive review of agency action. But in cases of great technological complexity, the best way for courts to guard against unreasonable or erroneous administrative decisions is not for the judges themselves to scrutinize the technical merits of each decision. Rather, it is to establish a decision-making process which assures a reasoned decision that can be held up to the scrutiny of the scientific community and the public.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David L. Bazelon David L. Bazelon International Harvester Co. v. Ruckelshaus…

I do not think the authors of the Clean Air Act intended to put such strict limits on our review of the Administrator's decision-making process. Further, the interests at stake in this case are too important to be resolved on the basis of traditional administrative labels. We recognized two years ago that environmental litigation represents a "new era" in administrative law. [4] We are dealing here not with an airline's fares or a broadcaster's wattage, but with all humanity's interest in life, health, and a harmonious relationship with the elements of nature.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David L. Bazelon David L. Bazelon International Harvester Co. v. Ruckelshaus…

Socrates said that wisdom is the recognition of how much one does not know. [1] I may be wise if that is wisdom, because [p651] I recognize that I do not know enough about dynamometer extrapolations, deterioration factor adjustments, and the like to decide whether or not the government's approach to these matters was statistically valid.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature