Summary

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Amell v. United States — Opinion of the Court

We can do no more than to exercise our best judgment in interpreting the will of Congress. In this instance, we believe the traditional treatment of federal employees by the Government tips the balance in favor of Court of Claims jurisdiction. The Court of Claims possesses the expertise necessary to adjudicate government wage claims. It also serves as a centralized forum for developing the law, particularly in large wage claim suits.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Amell v. United States — Opinion of the Court

When it comes to wage claims the Government treats the petitioners, to their detriment, as seamen. The workers, however, have their wages fixed by federal statutes and regulations, like other federal employees. It is true that their rates of pay are geared to the prevailing wage scale in private shipping operations, [6] but this factor diminishes upon analysis. A host of federal workers, like these seamen, have their rates of pay so adjusted.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Amell v. United States — Opinion of the Court

Here there is a specific provision-Section 205 of the Federal Employees Pay Act of 1945 [8] which fixes the ratio of overtime pay to the employees' basic pay. Congress has thus explicitly prescribed that overtime pay should be fixed in a uniform manner for all government wage-board employees, whether seamen or not. Furthermore, in determining the applicability of this uniform statutory requirement, the court will be interpreting the pay regulation of an executive department. This task is typically within the province and expertise of the Court of Claims.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature