Summary

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Covey v. Town of Somers — Opinion of the Court

Assuming the truth of the uncontradicted assertions, that the taxpayer Nora Brainard was wholly unable to understand the nature of the proceedings against her property (from which it must be inferred that she was unable to avail herself of the statutory procedure for redemption or answer) , and that the town authorities knew her to be an unprotected incompetent, we must hold that compliance with the statute would not afford notice to the incompetent and that a taking under such circumstances would be without due process of law.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Covey v. Town of Somers — Opinion of the Court

From these it appears that Nora Brainard was a long-time resident of the Town of Somers in the State of New York, and a person of means at all times financially able to meet her obligations, owning four pieces of improved real property in addition to the home property which has been taken by foreclosure. She lived alone, however, and had no relative in the State of New York or any other person present or available to assist her or to act in her behalf in connection with her taxes, despite the fact that she was and for upwards of 15 years had been an incompetent.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Covey v. Town of Somers — Opinion of the Court

The Second Department of the Appellate Division, which decided this case, has recognized the existence of equitable power to entertain a motion to open a default in an in rem tax proceeding. [1] If that were not enough, appellee, on oral argument, conceded that in an action of the sort contemplated by § 165-h (7) , the appellant would have been able to attack the deed only on the ground of alleged irregularities in the assessment and foreclosure proceedings.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature