Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Anderson National Bank v. Luckett…

While the seizure and escheat or forfeiture for mere dormancy of a national bank account are unusual, the escheat or appropriation by the state of property in fact abandoned or without an owner is, as we have seen, as old as the common law itself. Here there is no escheat or forfeiture by reason of dormancy. Dormancy without more is made the statutory ground for the state's taking inactive bank accounts into its custody, the state assuming the bank's obligation to the depositors.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Anderson National Bank v. Luckett…

The statute itself is notice to all depositors of banks within the state, of the conditions on which the balances of inactive accounts will be deemed presumptively abandoned, and their surrender to the state compelled. All persons having property located within a state and subject to its dominion must take note of its statutes affecting the control or disposition of such property and of the procedure which they set up for those purposes.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature