Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Engel v. O'Malley — Opinion of the Court

It is true, no doubt, that where size is not an index to an admitted evil, the law cannot discriminate between the great and small. But in this case size is an index. Where the average amount of each sum received is not less than $500, we know that we have not before us the class of ignorant and helpless depositors, largely foreign, whom the law seeks to protect.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Engel v. O'Malley — Opinion of the Court

It is said that even if the plaintiff could furnish the money and bond required, the comptroller might refuse a license upon his arbitrary whim. No guides are given in § 25 for the discretion that he is to exercise, and a provision in § 29e that nothing in the article shall be construed to require the comptroller to make any inquiry as to the solvency of any applicant is thought to exclude solvency as the test, and to leave the matter at sea.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature