Summary

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer United States v. Wardwell — Opinion of the Court

No time is mentioned within which he must apply for a warrant or after which the money is forfeited to the government. The ordinary rules for the maturity of negotiable paper do not control. Congress has directed that the money already once appropriated and checked against shall be placed in the treasury, and held subject to the call of the party for whose benefit it has been so appropriated and checked. There is no occasion for suit until after his application for a warrant is refused.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer United States v. Wardwell — Opinion of the Court

The secretary of the treasury was not authorized to fix such a limit. It was his duty, whenever the owner of the land or his legal representatives should apply for the money, to draw a warrant therefor without regard to the period which had elapsed since the sale. The fact that six or any other number of years had passed did not authorize him to refuse payment. The person entitled to the money could allow it to remain in the treasury for an indefinite period without losing his right to demand and receive it.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature