Summary

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Loving v. Virginia — Opinion of the Court (1967)

To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discriminations. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Loving v. Virginia — Opinion of the Court (1967)

There is patently no legitimate overriding purpose independent of invidious racial discrimination which justifies this classification. The fact that Virginia prohibits only interracial marriages involving white persons demonstrates that the racial classifications must stand on their own justification, as measures designed to maintain White Supremacy. [11] We have consistently denied [p. 12] the constitutionality of measures which restrict the rights of citizens on account of race.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Loving v. Virginia — Opinion of the Court (1967)

Because we reject the notion that the mere "equal application" of a statute containing racial classifications is enough to remove the classifications from the Fourteenth Amendment's proscription of all invidious racial discriminations, we do not accept the State's contention that these statutes should be upheld if there is any possible basis for concluding that they serve a rational purpose.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature