Summary

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren,  Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown…

“ The primary questions presented in this case are whether a Pennsylvania statute enacted in 1959 [1] which makes unlawful the Sunday retail sale of certain commodities, imposing a fine of up to one hundred dollars for the first offense, is violative of the constitutional guarantees of equal protection of the laws and religious freedom. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren,  Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown…

“ Appellant contends that the Pennsylvania Sunday Closing Law is one respecting an establishment of religion because it commemorates the Resurrection, obliges everyone to honor this basic doctrine of the major Christian denominations by abstaining from work and encourages Christian religious worship. Appellant also alleges that the statute discriminates against certain religions. For the same reasons stated in McGowan v. State of Maryland, supra, 366 U.S. at pages 429-431, 81 S.Ct. at pages 1107-1108, we hold that appellant has standing to raise only the first contention. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren,  Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown…

“ Municipalities and third-class Pennsylvania cities have statutory authority to restrain desecrations of the Sabbath day; one statutory section simply empowers various judicial officers to punish persons who profane the Lord's day. Barbering and beauty culture work on Sunday subjects the actor to license revocation. Male prisoners may not perform manual labor on Sunday, and bakery employees are not permitted to commence working on Sunday before 6 p.m. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature