Summary

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren United States v. An Article of Drug…

As Congressman Chapman of Kentucky explained to the House after the bill had passed the Senate, 'For the first time it is proposed in a bill before Congress to control therapeutic devices * * *. There are hundreds of worthless contrivances being sold to and used by gullible people. Suffice it to say that a fake contraption for the cure of consumption is just as serious a menace to health as is a worthless drug sold for the same disease.' 80 Cong.Rec.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren United States v. An Article of Drug…

Although a 'device' expressly cannot be a 'drug' under the last phrase of the drug definition above, a device is given almost a parallel definition in § 201 (h) :
'The term 'device' * * * means instruments, apparatus, and contrivances, including their components, parts, and accessories, intended (1) for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; or (2) to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals.' 21 U.S.C. § 321 (h) .
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren United States v. An Article of Drug…

But we are all the more convinced that we must give effect to congressional intent in view of the well-accepted principle that remedial legislation such as the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is to be given a liberal construction consistent with the Act's overriding purpose to protect the public health, and specifically, § 507's purpose to ensure that antibiotic products marketed serve the public with 'efficacy' and 'safety.' Cf.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature