Earl Warren,
United States v. Nardello — Opinion of the Court
“ The language of the Travel Act, 'whoever' crosses state lines or uses interstate facilities, includes private persons as well as public officials. [11] Appellees argue that Congress' decision not to define extortion combined with its decision to prohibit only extortion in violation of state law compels the conclusion that peculiar versions of state terminology are controlling. Since in Pennsylvania a distinction is maintained between extortion and blackmail with only the latter term covering appellees' activities, [12] it follows that the Travel Act does not reach the conduct charged. ”
