Summary

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren United States v. Shubert — Opinion of the Court

The producer of a play must therefore obtain playing dates in a number of suitable road-show towns, arranged so as to minimize lay-offs and travel between engagements. Successful operation of a theatre in a road-show town requires scheduling legitimate attractions so as to keep the theatre as continuously occupied as possible during the theatrical season. Playing dates of a road-show town must therefore be arranged so as to meet the needs of both the producer and the theatre operator.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren United States v. Shubert — Opinion of the Court

The allegations of the complaint, on a motion to dismiss, must of course be taken as true. And the defendants do not deny that the allegations state a cause of action if their business is subject to the Sherman Act. The question presented is thus a narrow one: whether the business of producing, booking, and presenting legitimate attractions on a multistate basis constitutes 'trade or commerce' that is 'among the several States' within the meaning of those terms in the Sherman Act.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren United States v. Shubert — Opinion of the Court

After negotiation with the producer of an attraction, UBO tentatively schedules it at various theatres throughout the United States, and contracts covering presentation at these theatres are subsequently executed (id., R. 5-6) . The booking of legitimate attractions involves the cross-country routing of attractions in a constant stream to and from theatres in various cities throughout the United States (par. 28, R. 5) .
The individual appellees control the booking of legitimate attractions in tryout and road-show towns in the United States (par. 37, R. 7) .
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature