Summary

Portrait of Edward Terry Sanford Edward Terry Sanford American National Company v. United States…

The Company's net income for the year could not have been rightly determined without deducting from the gross income represented by the commission notes, the obligations which it incurred under the bonus contracts, and would not have been accurately shown by keeping its books or making its return on the basis of actual receipts and disbursements. The method which it adopted clearly reflected the true income.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Edward Terry Sanford Edward Terry Sanford American National Company v. United States…

Furthermore, under the Company's practice, if any loan note was paid by the borrower before maturity, the difference between the amount of the bonus contract credited to the investor's account and the payments that had been made on the contract, was credited back to Profit and Loss, and treated as income of the Company for the year in which the note was paid.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature