Summary

Portrait of Edward Terry Sanford Edward Terry Sanford Rindge Company v. Los Angeles County Rindge Company…

The ranch owners concede that a genuine highway, in fact adapted as a way of convenience or necessity for public use and travel, is a public use. Their real contention is that these particular roads, while called highways are 'highways' in name merely, that is, that they are shams under the name of public improvements, which cannot, in fact, furnish ways of convenience or necessity to the traveling public.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Edward Terry Sanford Edward Terry Sanford Rindge Company v. Los Angeles County Rindge Company…

But aside from these considerations, these roads, especially the main road, through its connection with the public road coming along the shore from Santa Monica, will afford a highway for persons desiring to travel along the shore to the county line, with a view of the ocean on the one side, and of the mountain range on the other, constituting, as stated by the trial judge, a scenic highway of great beauty. Public uses are not limited, in the modern view, to matters of mere business necessity and ordinary convenience, but may extend to matters of public health, recreation and enjoyment.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature