Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Caldarola v. Eckert — Opinion of the Court

The United States, as amicus curiae, submitted what we deem to be conclusive considerations against reading the contract so as to find the Agents to be owners pro hac vice in possession and control of the vessel. The consequences, to both the national and international interests of the United States, of such a construction would be too far-reaching to warrant such a forced reading merely in order to have a basis on which to build liability under the law of New York.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Caldarola v. Eckert — Opinion of the Court

We agree that if, on a fair reading of the contract, the control which the Agents had over the vessel is the kind of control which New York requires as a basis of liability to third persons, the New York courts cannot so read the contract as to deny the right which New York recognizes. It is not claimed that an injured party has rights under the agency contract, or that it created duties to third persons.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature