Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter United States v. Dege — Opinion of the Court

If the Court's opinion reflects all that there is to this case, it is astonishing that it has taken so many years for the federal judiciary to loose itself from the medieval chains of the husband-wife conspiracy doctrine. The problem, as the Court sees it, is almost absurdly uncomplicated: The basis for the notion that husband and wife are not subject to a conspiracy charge is that man and wife are one; but we know that man and wife are two, not one; therefore, there is no basis for the notion that husband and wife and not subject to a conspiracy charge.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter United States v. Dege — Opinion of the Court

For this Court now to act on Hawkins's formulation of the medieval view that husband and wife 'are esteemed but as one Person in Law, and are presumed to have but one Will' would indeed be 'blind imitation of the past.' It would require us to disregard the vast changes in the status of woman-the extension of her rights and correlative duties-whereby a wife's legal submission to her husband has been wholly wiped out, not only in the English-speaking world generally but emphatically so in this country.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter United States v. Dege — Opinion of the Court

Such an immunity to husband and wife as a pair of conspirators would have to attribute to Congress one of two assumptions: either that responsibility of husband and wife for joint participation in a criminal enterprise would make for marital disharmony, or that a wife must be presumed to act under the coercive influence of her husband and, therefore, cannot be a willing participant.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature