Summary

Frank Danby The Story Behind the Verdict — The Inquest on Armand le Mesurier (1915)

Wilbur, don't say or think it—it's—it's impossible! Don't look like that: everyone will be staring at us. Pull yourself together. This is not what you came here to tell me. What did you come to tell me?"
Keightley answered dully, "I came to tell you Stanley Dacre shot Harry Maingaye, that he was intriguing with Inez at the time. But it isn't true: of course it isn't true."
The magnetism of the picture drew him. He looked again into the light, visionary eyes of a boy of high lineage, holding himself proudly, the son of Inez B. Mott.
"Stanley Dacre!" repeated Roger in a bewildered manner.
Source: Wikisource

Frank Danby The Story Behind the Verdict — The Inquest on Armand le Mesurier (1915)

And when he came as far as this—when he came as far as to admit that, although he had met Stanley Dacre staring at the windows of Inez's flat, it was not sufficient proof that he had murdered Harry Maingaye in order to enjoy her company, he found himself quite suddenly, and without any preparation at all, gazing again into those very eyes with which he had told the court at the coroner's inquest he was familiar—those strange light eyes.
Source: Wikisource

Frank Danby The Story Behind the Verdict — The Inquest on Armand le Mesurier (1915)

He was so buoyant that he walked all the way home, thinking of how he would triumph over David Devenish, win his bet, spread himself over that column and leader. In justice to him, however, it must be admitted that he never thought of what his discovery might be going to mean to poor Stanley Dacre, or what would be the upshot.
Keightley had to talk, every man had a weakness, and that was admittedly his. Because David must not know until the last minute, and he could not talk to his mother of Inez B. Mott, Roger Macphail seemed marked out for his confidant.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature