Summary

Frank Murphy Brooks v. United States (337 U.S. 49…

A battle commander's poor judgment, an army surgeon's slip of hand, a defective jeep which causes injury, all would ground tort actions against the United States. But we are dealing with an accident which had nothing to do with the Brooks' army careers, injuries not caused by their service except in the sense that all human events depend upon what has already transpired.
Source: Wikisource

Frank Murphy Brooks v. United States (337 U.S. 49…

But this does not mean that the amount payable under servicemen's benefit laws should not be deducted, or taken into consideration, when the serviceman obtains judgment under the Tort Claims Act. Without the benefit of argument in this Court, or discussion of the matter in the Court of Appeals, we now see no indication that Congress meant the United States to pay twice for the same injury. Certain elements of tort damages may be t e equivalent of elements taken into account in providing disability payments.
Source: Wikisource

Frank Murphy Brooks v. United States (337 U.S. 49…

They provide for District Court jurisdiction over any claim founded on negligence brought against the United States. We are not persuaded that 'any claim' means 'any claim but that of servicemen.' The statute doen contain twelve exceptions. § 421 (now 28 U.S.C.A. § 2680) . None exclude petitioners' claims. One is for claims arising in a foreign country. A second excludes claims arising out of combatant activities of the military or naval forces, or the Coast Guard, during time of war.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature