Summary

George Sutherland Waterloo Distilling Corporation v…

It is the property which is proceeded against, and, by resort to a legal fiction, held guilty and condemned as though it were conscious instead of inanimate and insentient. In a criminal prosecution it is the wrongdoer in person who is proceeded against, convicted and punished. The forfeiture is no part of the punishment for the criminal offense.
Source: Wikisource

George Sutherland Waterloo Distilling Corporation v…

The fraud alleged was the withdrawal of alcohol ostensibly for nonbeverage but in reality for beverage purposes, without payment of the tax on spirits diverted to beverage purposes imposed by section 600 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1918, as amended (26 USCA § 245) . The corporation denied any violation of law. Evidence was introduced by the government tending to support the libel.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature