Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Biddle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

If a dividend is declared, it must be paid, however the deduction is made, from what is left after the corporation has paid taxes upon its earnings. The differences in the two methods of deduction are to be found only in the formal bookkeeping data which, in the British system, are communicated to the stockholders, not for the purpose of laying or collecting the tax which the corporation has already paid or must pay, but to aid the stockholders in computing their surtax and in securing the benefit of any refund of the tax.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Biddle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

The stockholders' surtax is computed upon the gross dividend, the dividend which he actually receives plus the tax deducted. [6] if the stockholder's income is exempt or less than the minimum amount subject to the tax, refund is made to him of the proportionate share of the tax paid by the corporation. [7] It is upon these features of the British system that the taxpayers chiefly rely to support their argument that the stockholder pays the tax.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Biddle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Each of the corporations having itself paid or become liable to pay the British tax on the profits thus distributed, no further exaction at the 'standard' (normal) rate was due the British government on account of the distribution from either the stockholders or the corporation. [1] Only in the case of individuals whose income exceeds a stated amount is a surtax levied.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature