Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Henry Ford Son v. Little Falls Fibre Company…

Whether the Commission acted within or without its jurisdiction in granting the license, and even though the rights which the respondents here assert be deemed subordinate to the power of the national government to control navigation, the present legislation does not purport to authorize a licensee of the Commission to impair such rights recognized by state law without compensation. Even though not immune from such destruction, they are, nevertheless, an appropriate subject for legislative protection.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Henry Ford Son v. Little Falls Fibre Company…

As the license also permits, but does not require, petitioner has placed flashboards on the crest of the dam which, under normal conditions, raise the level of the water in the pool above the dam approximately two feet. Electric power developed by the project is used in the business of an affiliated private manufacturing corporation. The maintenance of the water at the new level has resulted in materially raising the water at the tailraces of respondents' power plants, with a corresponding reduction of the head of water and of the power developed at their dam.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature