Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Jordan v. K Tashiro — Opinion of the Court

It would be difficult to select any single agency of more universal use or more generally recognized as a usual and appropriate means of carrying on commerce and trade than the business corporation. And it would, we think, be a narrow interpretation indeed, which, in the absence of restrictive language, would lead to the conclusion that the treaty had secured to citizens of Japan the privilege of engaging in a particular business, but had denied to them the privilege of conducting that business in corporate form.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Jordan v. K Tashiro — Opinion of the Court

The petitioners insist that the construction and operation of a hospital is not one of the purposes prescribed by the treaty, which, it is argued, are limited so far as 'trade' and 'commerce' are concerned to the purchase and sale or exchange of goods and commodities, and that, in any case, the treaty does not confer upon Japanese subjects, resident in California, the privilege of forming a corporation under the laws of California or of leasing lands through a corporate agency for such a purpose.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature