Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Morf v. Bingaman — Opinion of the Court

Nor is it important that a part of the fees collected is not devoted directly to highway maintenance, the cost of which the state pays in part from the proceeds of a general property tax. The use for highway maintenance of a fee collected from automobile owners may be of significance, when the point is otherwise in doubt, to show that the fee is in fact laid for that purpose and is thus a charge for the privilege of using the highways.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Morf v. Bingaman — Opinion of the Court

Such discrimination as there may be is not between those who, like appellant, drive their automobiles to market in caravans and others who drive them singly, for both are taxed. Discrimination, if any, is between those who drive their cars to market singly and others who drive them for other purposes, and may be subjected to a different tax. Appellant does not assert that he belongs to either class. As the traffic in which he participates is properly taxed, he cannot complain of the imposition of the tax on a business which he does not do.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature