Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone United States v. Wabash Railroad Company…

After a study of the conditions at some two hundred industrial plants to which the rail carriers made allowances for spotting service performed by the industries, and at numerous other plants where the spotting service was rendered without charge by the carriers, the Commission found that the freight rates had not been so fixed as to compensate the carriers for such service and that the railroads by assuming to perform it, or pay for its performance by the industries, had assumed a burden not included in the transportation service compensated by the filed tariffs.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone United States v. Wabash Railroad Company…

If the Commission's reference, in its conclusion of law, to 'a preferential service not accorded to shippers generally' means more than the statement in the fifth finding of fact that the service is 'in excess of those rendered shippers generally in the receipt and delivery of traffic on team tracks', it is obviously irrelevant to the present proceeding.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone United States v. Wabash Railroad Company…

The Commission emphasized that no question of discrimination or preference prohibited by §§ 2 and 3 was involved in the present proceeding when it found that the evidence did not show that the circumstances and conditions under which the spotting is performed at other plants are substantially similar to those at the Staley plant, and that if it did that it would only tend to show that the practice was unlawful at the others as well.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature