Summary

Portrait of Harold Hitz Burton Harold Hitz Burton Curcio v. United States — Opinion of the Court

The custodian's act of producing books or records in response to a subpoena duces tecum is itself a representation that the documents produced are those demanded by the subpoena. Requiring the custodian to identify or authenticate the documents for admission in evidence merely makes explicit what is implicit in the production itself. The custodian is subjected to little, if any, further danger of incrimination.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harold Hitz Burton Harold Hitz Burton Curcio v. United States — Opinion of the Court

However, in the instant case, the Government is seeking to compel the custodian to do more than identify documents already produced. It seeks to compel him to disclose, by his oral testimony, the whereabouts of books and records which he has failed to produce. It even seeks to make the custodian name the persons in whose possession the missing books may be found. Answers to such questions are more than 'auxiliary to the production' of unprivileged corporate or association records.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature