Summary

Homma v. Patterson — Opinion of the Court

For the first time the Court, by its denial of the applications with the effect of sustaining the commission's jurisdiction, permits trial for a capital offense under a binding procedure which allows forced confessions to be received in evidence; [1] makes proof in prior trials of groups for mass offenses 'prima facie evidence that the accused is likewise guilty of that offense'
Source: Wikisource

Homma v. Patterson — Opinion of the Court

The commission also then denied the motion of counsel for the defense to postpone the trial for ten days. This motion was supported by affidavit of chief counsel, dated January 2, 1945, which set forth that he and his associates began work on preparing the defense on December 16; that 'each of the 48 specifications requires a detailed investigation and that eighteen days have proved insufficient time to accomplish even a small portion of this investigation'
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature