Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Tomkins v. Missouri — Opinion of the Court

But we can hardly demand of a layman and pauper who draws his petition behind prison walls the skill of one trained in the law. If we were to take that course, we would compound the injury caused by the original denial of counsel. A deprivation of the constitutional right of counsel should not be readily inferred from vague allegations. But where the substance of the claim is clear, we should not insist upon more refined allegations than paupers, ignorant of their right of counsel and incapable of making their defense, could be expected to supply.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Tomkins v. Missouri — Opinion of the Court

And the ingredients of the crime of murder in the first degree as distinguished from the lesser offenses are not simple but ones over which skilled judges and practitioners have disagreements. [4] The guilding hand of counsel is needed lest the unwary concede that which only bewilderment or ignorance could justify or pay a penalty which is greater than the law of the State exacts for the offense which they in fact and in law committed.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature