Howell Edmunds Jackson

Howell Edmunds Jackson

Summary

Portrait of Howell Edmunds Jackson Howell Edmunds Jackson Brownell v. Singer — Dissent

It was intimated in argument that the purpose of seizure of this fund is to defeat the preference for this claim in the interest of other creditors outside of New York who will not be paid in full. This would mean a distribution of the New York assets at odds with the New York Banking Law. But it is apparent that a large number of New York creditors have been paid in full from the New York assets, and just why this creditor, who stands on an equality with them, should be deprived of his claim of preference while the others retain theirs is hard to understand.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Howell Edmunds Jackson Howell Edmunds Jackson Brownell v. Singer — Dissent

He requested the Superintendent to advise him of all claims which he intended to accept and to notify him when he had liquidated assets sufficient to pay and had paid all accepted and established claims and expenses of liquidation in order that the Custodian might take such action 'at that time with respect to the assets remaining in your hands' as he might deem necessary.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature