Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Armstrong v. United States (364 U.S. 40…

It reasoned that because the contract between Rice and the United States contemplated that title to the vessels would eventually vest in the Government, the Government had 'inchoate title' to the materials supplied by petitioners, rendering such materials 'public works' immune from the outset to petitioners' liens. We cannot agree that a mere prospect that property will later be owned by the United States renders that property immune from otherwise valid liens.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature