Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Avery v. Alabama — Opinion of the Court

The Constitution's guarantee of assistance of counsel cannot be satisfied by mere formal appointment.
In determining whether petitioner has been denied his constitutional right to assistance of counsel, we must remember that the Fourteenth Amendment does not limit the power of the States to try and deal with crimes committed within their borders, [7] and was not intended to bring to the test of a decision of this Court every ruling made in the course of a State trial.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Avery v. Alabama — Opinion of the Court

But counsel were duly appointed for petitioner by the trial court as required both by Alabama law [4] and the Fourteenth Amendment.
Since the Constitution nowhere specifies any period which must intervene between the required appointment of counsel and trial, the fact, standing alone, that a continuance has been denied, does not constitute a denial of the constitutional right to assistance of counsel.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Avery v. Alabama — Opinion of the Court

In the course of trial, after due appointment of competent counsel, many procedural questions necessarily arise which must be decided by the trial judge in the light of facts then presented and conditions then existing. Disposition of a request for continuance is of this nature and is made in the discretion of the trial judge, the exercise of which will ordinarily not be reviewed.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature