Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Dennis v. United States (384 U.S. 855…

Accordingly, in holding that petitioners have no right to challenge § 9 (h) , the Court must conclude that even if § 9 (h) is a bill of attainder, petitioners have nevertheless conspired to interfere with some lawful and legitimate function of government. Yet the Court nowhere points out any governmental function that could have been interfered with by the false affidavits except functions performed under § 9 (h) which the Court for purposes of this argument assumes is a bill of attainder.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature