Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Jackson v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Company…

In the final analysis the contention here against recovery as in Yaka is that the longshoreman who is employed to work on a ship by an independent stevedore company instead of the shipowner can recover for the unseaworthiness of the vessel, but a longshoreman hired by the same shipowner to do exactly the same kind of work on an unseaworthy ship cannot recover. We reject this contention as we did before. [5] We cannot accept such a construction of the Act-an Act designed to provide equal justice to every longshoreman similarly situated.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Jackson v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Company…

Lykes moved to dismiss on the ground that § 5 of the federal Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act provides that compensation benefits required by that Act to be given by an employer to a longshoreman or his representative for 'injury or death' 'shall be exclusive and in place of all other liability of such employer to the employee.' [1] The trial court, sustaining Lykes' motion on the ground assigned in it, dismissed petitioner's suit and th § tate Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, affirmed.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature