Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores… (1959)

Klor's is as well equipped as Broadway-Hale to handle all brands of appliances. Nevertheless, manufacturers and distributors of such well-known brands as General Electric, RCA, Admiral, Zenith, Emerson and others [2] have conspired among themselves and with Broadway-Hale either not to sell to Klor's or to sell to it only at discriminatory prices and highly unfavorable terms. Broadway-Hale has used its 'monopolistic' buying power to bring about this situation. The business of manufacturing, distributing and selling household appliances is in interstate commerce.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores… (1959)

Monopoly can as surely thrive by the elimination of such small businessmen, one at a time, as it can by driving them out in large groups. In recognition of this fact the Sherman Act has consistently been read to forbid all contracts and combinations 'which 'tend to create a monopoly," whether 'the tendency is a creeping one' or 'one that proceeds at full gallop.' International Salt Co.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature