Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Madruga v. Superior Court of California ex rel…

We have no reason to believe federal procedure if applied to partition cases would be simpler, speedier, less expensive or fairer than the procedures of state courts. Nor are we convinced that any theoretical benefits to shipping would justify us in restricting the partition jurisdiction of state courts by fashioning an exclusive national rule to govern quarreling shipowners.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Madruga v. Superior Court of California ex rel…

Ordering the sale of property for partition is part of their everyday work. Long experience has enabled states to develop simple legislative and judicial partition procedures with which local judges and counsel are familiar. Federal courts have rarely been called on to try such disputes and have established no settled rules for partition.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Madruga v. Superior Court of California ex rel…

Whether this grants United States district courts power to sell ships for partition of the proceeds has never been squarely decided by this Court. The partition power of admiralty was discussed but left in doubt by Mr. Justice Story in The Steamboat Orleans v. Phoebus, 1837, 11 Pet. 175, 183, 9 L.Ed. 677. [2] Some cases in lower federal courts appear to support the jurisdiction of district admiralty courts to order sales for partition, at least where there is a dispute as to use of the ship between part owners having equal interests and shares.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature