Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Pennsylvania ex rel. Herman v. Claudy…

Moreover, the number and complexity of the charges against petitioner, as well as their seriousness create a strong conviction that no layman could have understood the accusations and that petitioner should, therefore, have been advised of his right to be represented by counsel. We cannot agree with the Pennsylvania Superior Court that the mere fact that petitioner had, without the benefit of counsel, pleaded guilty to an offense 2 years before showed that he had the capacity to defend himself against the 30 charges here.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Pennsylvania ex rel. Herman v. Claudy…

Our prior decisions have established that: (1) a conviction following trial or on a plea of guilty based on a confession extorted by violence or by mental coercion is invalid under the Federal Due Process Clause; [2] (2) where a person convicted in a state court has not intelligently and understandingly waived the benefit of counsel and where the circumstances show that his rights could not have been fairly protected without counsel, the Due Process Clause invalidates his conviction
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Pennsylvania ex rel. Herman v. Claudy…

The sound premise upon which these holdings rested is that men incarcerated in flagrant violation of their constitutional rights have a remedy.
The chief argument made by the State here in support of the court's summary dismissal of the petition is this: 'Counsel for petitioner argues that since facts are alleged in the petition, a hearing must be held. Since our answer contradicted the allegations in the petition, the lower court was not required to grant a hearing.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature