Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Rosenberg v. Yee Chien Woo — Opinion of the Court

It was never intended to open the United States to refugees who had found shelter in another nation and had begun to build new lives. Nor could Congress have intended to make refugees in flight from persecution compete with all of the world's resettled refugees for the 10,200 entries and permits afforded each year under § 203 (a) (7) . Such an interpretation would subvert the lofty goals embodied in the whole pattern of our refugee legislation.
In short, we hold that the 'resettlement' concept is not irrelevant.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Rosenberg v. Yee Chien Woo — Opinion of the Court

Far from encouraging resettled refugees to leave one secure haven for another, the Act established United States quotas as a percentage-25%-of the refugees absorbed by all other cooperating nations. The Fair Share Refugee Act, like its successor and predecessors, was enacted to help alleviate the suffering of homeless persons and the political instability associated with their plight.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature