Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Clark v. Allen — Opinion of the Court

Much reliance for the contrary view is placed on the power to vest alien property in an agency of the United States. [10] But the power to vest, i.e., to take away, what may be owned or acquired does not reveal a policy at odds with the reciprocal right to inherit granted by Article IV of the treaty. For the power to vest is discretionary not mandatory. The loss of the inheritance by vesting is, therefore, not inevitable. But more important, vesting does not necessarily deprive the alien enemy of all the benefits of his inheritance.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Clark v. Allen — Opinion of the Court

In summary, we hold that disposition of the realty is governed by Article IV of the treaty. Disposition of the personalty, however, is not governed by the treaty unless it is determined that Alvina Wagner was a German national. If she was an American citizen, disposition of the personalty is governed by California law. Whether there are other requirements of the California statute which would bar the California heirs-at-law is a question on which we intimate no opinion.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature