Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Kolovrat v. Oregon — Opinion of the Court

While courts interpret treaties for themselves, the meaning given them by the departments of government particularly charged with their negotiation and enforcement is given great weight. [11] We have before us statements, in the form of diplomatic notes exchanged between the responsible agencies of the United States and of Yugoslavia, to the effect that the 1881 Treaty, now and always, has been construed as providing for inheritance by both countries' nationals without regard to the location of the property to be passed or the domiciles of the nationals.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Kolovrat v. Oregon — Opinion of the Court

Thus, recognizing quite properly that state policies as to the rights of aliens to inherit must give way under our Constitution's Supremacy Clause to 'overriding' federal treaties and conflicting arrangements, the state court considered petitioners' contention, supported in this Court by the Government as amicus curiae, that petitioners were entitled to inherit this personal property because of an 1881 Treaty between the United States and Serbia, which country is now a part of Yugoslavia.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature