Summary

Portrait of William R. Day William R. Day Sullivan v. Kidd — Opinion of the Court

Writers of authority agree that treaties are to be interpreted upon the principles which govern the interpretation of contracts in writing between individuals, and are to be executed in the utmost good faith, with a view to making effective the purposes of the high contracting parties; that all parts of a treaty are to receive a reasonable construction with a view to giving a fair operation to the whole.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William R. Day William R. Day Sullivan v. Kidd — Opinion of the Court

Whatever the Dominion may see fit to do in the exercise of its own legislative authority cannot affect the right of a state of the American Union to determine for herself whether aliens shall inherit property within her borders. The construction insisted upon by the United States makes for the exchange of reciprocal rights under the provisions of the treaty, and when the required notice is given, British subjects resident of Canada would have property rights in the United States similar to those accorded citizens of the United States in Canada.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William R. Day William R. Day Sullivan v. Kidd — Opinion of the Court

While the question of the construction of treaties is judicial in its nature, and courts when called upon to act should be careful to see that international engagements are faithfully kept and observed, the construction placed upon the treaty before us and consistently adhered to by the Executive Department of the Government, charged with the supervision of our foreign relations, should be given much weight.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature