Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Voeller v. Neilston Warehouse Company…

If thereafter the failure of the directors to make a counter-offer materially prejudices the financial stake of the majority, it is no more a want of due process to consider the majority bound thereby than it is to consider them bound by any other act of management. The majority are participants in a corporate enterprise. In entrusting their capital to the corporation, they accept the disadvantages of the corporate system along with its advantages.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Voeller v. Neilston Warehouse Company…

The objective of the Ohio statute permitting the right of appraisal to dissenting shareholders was the elimination of abuses that had long been a fixture in the field of corporate finance. [6] To assure that the right to appraisal would be promptly resorted to and to provide for the contingency that in some cases no such resort would be taken, the Ohio legislature thought it advisable to provide that under some circumstances the original offer or counter-offer should conclusively be deemed equal to the fair cash value.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature