Summary

J. St. J. Higgins Deistical platitude vamping and "providence… (1898)

Edgley that even a fetish cannot very well have sex if it have no form. Anyhow, if Mr. Edgley is unable to show that some varieties—"allotropic modifications," if he likes—of his Deity have no form and yet have sex—a demonstration which must require some smart juggling with theological fallacies—it is evident he has needlessly complicated a needlessly intricate conception, by his use of the word "sex."
Source: Wikisource

J. St. J. Higgins Deistical platitude vamping and "providence… (1898)

Edgley— the fact remains that bad effects are sensibly produced, and, if we admit existence of the controlling, thinking, omnipresent deity of your correspondent, it is right to regard such responsible for resorting to such drastic measures to counteract or control the results of his own handiwork, instead of arranging so that this tinkering with consequences would not be necessary.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature