Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Claiborne-Annapolis Ferry Company v…

The right of appellant ferry company to institute and maintain this proceeding rests wholly upon the permission granted by paragraph 20, § 1. 'Any party in interest' may institute a suit to enjoin proposed construction, operation, or abandonment of a carrier's line unless it has obtained a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the Interstate Commerce Commission. In the absence of such certificate the doing of any of these things is declared to be unlawful-a crime subject to punishment by fine and imprisonment.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Claiborne-Annapolis Ferry Company v…

The Claiborne-Annapolis Ferry Company (appellant) , Maryland corporation, which operates a ferry from Annapolis across Chesapeake Bay, intervened and opposed the railway's application 'for the reason that the ferry service proposed to be operated by the applicant from Chesapeake Beach, Calvert County, Maryland, to a point on Trippe's Bay in Dorchester County, Maryland, will interfere with and hamper the efforts of your petitioner to give adequate service on its present route'-twenty miles further north.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature