Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Roe v. Kansas ex rel. Smith — Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court of the State held that-
'The meaning of the statute is clear enough, that places invested with unusual historical interest may be acquired by the state by gift, devise, or condemnation, for the use and benefit of the state, as places of that character. If there were any doubt about this, the joint resolution and appropriation act relating to acquisition of the Shawnee Mission interpret the eminent domain statute, and show what the legislative intention was. The state historical society is to be custodian of the place.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Roe v. Kansas ex rel. Smith — Opinion of the Court

Charles O'Connor et al. (No. 61) 278 U.S. 188, 49 S.C.t. 158, 73 L. Ed. -, just decided, we have referred to the statutes and rule which give us authority to impose penalties and costs where causes are brought here upon frivolous appeals or writs of error. The alleged ground for the present writ is without substance, and the circumstances justify the imposition of a penalty upon the party at fault.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature