Summary

Portrait of James D. Whittemore James D. Whittemore,  Schiavo ex rel. Schindler v. Schiavo…

“ The plain language of the statute prohibits government from imposing a substantial burden on the religious exercise of an individual such as Theresa Schiavo. Similarly, the Free Exercise Clause contained in the First Amendment of the Constitution expressly protects the exercise of religion. In their Complaint, Plaintiffs allege that the state court's order imposes a substantial burden on Theresa Schiavo's free exercise of religion. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James D. Whittemore James D. Whittemore,  Schiavo ex rel. Schindler v. Schiavo…

“ As the Florida Second District Court of Appeal explained, where two "suitable surrogate decision-maker [s] . . .could not agree on the proper decision, ..." the guardian may invoke "the trial court's jurisdiction to allow the trial court to serve as the surrogate decision-maker." Schindler v. Schiavo (In re Schiavo) , 780 So. 2d 176, 178 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001) ("Schiavo I") . Pursuant to Florida law, therefore, Judge Greer, as the presiding judge, had a statutory obligation to resolve the competing contentions between Michael Schiavo and Plaintiffs. Fla. Stat. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature