Summary

Portrait of James Moore Wayne James Moore Wayne Union Bank of Tennessee v. Vaiden…

In June, 1852, defendants filed their answer. The principal averments in the bill are admitted-it is admitted that they have received assets to the amount of $20,000; that they have paid all the debts which have been legally established against the estate to the amount of more than $13,000, and have in their hands assets to the value of $6,500, and that if complainant's claim is disallowed, the estate will be worth to the heirs about $6,000. They are advised that complainant's judgment is barred, and if they were to pay it, they would pay it in their own wrong.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Moore Wayne James Moore Wayne Union Bank of Tennessee v. Vaiden…

But we do not deem it necessary to discuss them in detail, for the law of a State limiting the remedies of its citizens in its own courts, cannot be applied to prevent the citizens of other States from suing in the courts of the United States in that State for the recovery of any property or money there, to which they may be legally or equitably entitled.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature